October 13, 2026
BUET Dropped Its Preliminary MCQ -- and Each Remaining Question Is Now Worth 67% More
BUET's 2025-26 cycle is the first to drop its preliminary MCQ stage entirely in favour of a single written exam -- 20 questions per subject worth 10 marks each -- which raises the per-question stakes well above a typical 100-question MCQ paper.
BUET (Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology) admission has long followed a two-stage format: a preliminary MCQ to shortlist candidates, then a written exam for the shortlisted pool. The 2025-26 cycle breaks from that -- it's the first cycle to drop the preliminary MCQ stage entirely, admitting only merit-shortlisted candidates (10,351 this cycle) straight to a single written exam.
1. The real written structure. Group Ka (Engineering and Urban and Regional Planning) sits Module A: a 3-hour, 600-mark paper covering Higher Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry, 20 questions per subject, each worth 10 marks. Group Kha (Architecture) sits the same 600-mark, 3-hour Module A plus an additional 400-mark Module B. No confirmed negative-marking policy for this written format was found in this sourcing pass -- worth noting precisely because every other exam in this series does have a confirmed, often harsh, negative-marking rule, and BUET may not.
2. Why dropping the MCQ changes the stakes per question. A typical Bangladesh government or admission MCQ exam -- medical admission, Combined Bank Officer, GST -- runs 100 questions worth 1 mark each, so any single question is 1% of the total score. BUET's Group Ka written exam is 20 questions per subject across 3 subjects: 60 questions total, each worth 10 of the 600 marks, or 1.67% of the exam. No consulted source frames it this way, but the arithmetic is direct: at 1.67% versus 1% per question, each individual question on BUET's written paper carries roughly 67% more weight than a question on a standard 100-question MCQ exam.
3. What higher per-question stakes actually mean. On a 100-question MCQ paper, a single wrong answer is a rounding error against the total. On BUET's 60-question written paper, the same single mistake -- or, more likely, a question left incomplete under time pressure -- costs nearly two-thirds again as much. With only 20 questions per subject and 3 hours on the clock (roughly 9 minutes per question across the full module), there's less room to treat any individual question as disposable.
4. The format shift itself matters beyond the arithmetic. A 10-mark written question, unlike a binary-scored MCQ item, plausibly allows partial credit for shown working even when the final answer is wrong -- a completely different risk profile from an MCQ exam's all-or-nothing scoring. That means BUET's guessing-and-elimination strategies, which dominate prep advice for every MCQ-based exam in this series, simply don't transfer to BUET's current format; the skill being tested is sustained problem-solving execution, not answer-option triage.
5. The pool itself stays small. At 10,351 merit-shortlisted candidates eligible to sit, BUET's written exam is a pre-filtered, high-stakes-per-candidate test rather than a mass-volume screen -- a fundamentally different competitive dynamic from the six-figure applicant pools covered elsewhere in this series.
Camino Prep's exam calendar tracks BUET's application and test dates as each cycle is announced -- check the BUET admission listing for the latest confirmed schedule.